Pipeline Carrying Hydrofracked Gas Planned For the 8th C.D.

Green Party candidate rails against proposal to transport natural gas from upstate New York through Gateway National Recreation Area in Queens.

With its reeds, ponds and marshes filled with hundreds of species of birds, Gateway National Recreation Area seems a world away from the brownstone-lined streets of Brooklyn.

But given the far-reaching boundaries of the , which stretches from Fort Greene to south Queens, the debate over the future of this wildlife sanctuary recently injected itself into the very Brooklyn-centered race to replace longtime Rep. Edolphus "Ed" Towns.

“This is the thin end of the wedge in New York,” said Green Party candidate and Clinton Hill resident , who along with Republican Alan Bellone, will face off against Democratic Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries in November.

In a statement earlier this week, Beavan came out strongly against a bill in Congress that would clear the way for construction of the Rockaway Lateral pipeline through Gateway that would link the city to natural gas obtained through the controversial process of hydrofracking.

"This is the mountaintop removal of the Northeast—and it’s not even a good energy strategy for the state or the nation," Beavan said.

The bill, H.R. 2606, would allow pipeline construction in national parkland—in this case through Gateway, which encompasses not only a wildlife sanctuary strattling Jamaica Bay, but also Floyd Bennett Field in Brooklyn and a public beach.

Jeffries, long considered a favorite to take the seat vacated by fellow Democrat Towns, expressed his own concerns about the bill, which is currently being considered by a Senate subcommittee.

"There are legitimate issues that have been raised about the process in which this legislation passed the House of Representatives, as well as the important concerns about its environmental impact," Jeffries said in a statement. "I urge the Senate to exercise caution and commence hearings to ensure that the full implications of this bill are understood by the public before moving forward."

As the central figure in the documentary, "No Impact Man," Beavan offered a different perspective on the debate—one in which a complete rethinking of the nation's dependence on fossil fuels was in order.

“Currently, our national energy policy benefits the multi-national energy corporations, not the people of my district or the country,” he said.

Anita August 22, 2012 at 02:42 PM
I have to say I agree with Beavan. We've got to start figuring out way to break free from our dependence on fossil fuels. Efforts like this are only a bandaid and can possibly cause more damage than they're worth. MTR is dangerous and scary business as is hydrofracking...
Adam Whitehead September 27, 2012 at 12:28 AM
Environmentalists have got to face the realities of the 21st century. If they don't want fossil fuels, and they don't like nuclear power plants, why do they keep opposing upgrades to the grid, meaning our system of electric transmission lines?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »